When President Donald Trump hosted Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, observers at the meeting were diverted by something aside from politics. Photographs of the Oval Office showed a blinding sight: gold moldings, heavy-framed portraits, eagle-legged desks, and gleaming vases.
Less presidential suite, more Mar-a-Lago annex. Trump has never been bashful, and his new digs show that loud and over-the-top are central to his persona.
But now interior designers around the globe are weighing in. Is it genius and daring—or just tacky? Welcome to a golden debate of style, power, personality, and how to decorate on purpose.
Every President Leaves a Stamp—Trump’s Just Glows
Every American president gets the chance to leave his mark on the Oval Office. Barack Obama went with traditional elegance with subtle colors and old-school restraint. Joe Biden shook it up with deep blues and soft lighting to create a soothing feeling of gravity.
Trump opted for visual domination. The subtle gestures are a thing of the past. Instead: walls of blazing frames and rough-hewn symbolism.
“It’s never been this way,” boasted Trump to Laura Ingraham. He’s right. No one has assaulted decadence this aggressively—and no one has generated this amount of design discourse.
The Gold Standard (Literally)
Gold is everywhere. From molding around the fireplace to side-table decor, the room almost shines. Seven golden vases are proudly perched on tables, and ornate eagle side tables seem to have flown straight from the den of a Roman emperor.
Even the gallery wall, which is packed to overflowing with portraits, has thick heavy golden frames vying for notice. There’s a lot there.
Critics call it sensory overload and that Trump’s gold fetish disregards the importance of balance. Supporters call it unapologetically presidential. Regardless of whether you call it bold or brash, one thing is certain: subtlety was not invited.
A Designer’s Dilemma
Interior designers are ruthlessly divided. Some see clear craftsmanship, others, chaos. “There is no respect for negative space,” a New York designer proclaimed. “It’s all flash, no flow.” Without any empty space, everything competes for attention.
Still, some of Trump’s supporters argue that the room’s appearance is a kind of old-world decadence—if that decadence had been passed through a casino. Others argue that it’s consistent with Trump’s brand, and therefore genuine.
The larger issue, they argue, is whether personal taste or institutional heft should be reflected in the Oval Office. In Trump’s case, taste certainly won out. But depending on your view, that may not be a compliment.
From Subtle to Showy—A Visual Timeline
If you map Oval Office style over the last decades, Trump’s redo is a glaring, gilded thumb that sticks out. Bill Clinton added a luxurious navy carpet. George W. Bush liked warm, earthy tones.
Obama opted for soothing grays and restraint. Biden’s version brought back color and heritage, with busts and paintings tastefully selected. Trump, however, went maximalist.
Every surface is retouched. Every frame is loaded with embellishment. The whole room hums with visual overload. It’s not an aesthetic decision—it’s a statement. Whether that statement is presidential or theatrical is up to you—and your tolerance for gold.
The Psychology of Shiny Things
Gold is not merely a color—it’s a metaphor. Psychologists tell us that we pair gold with wealth, power, and legacy. Trump’s lifelong obsession with gold is based on these connotations. Gold in his hotels and in his penthouse is a symbol of dominance.
But according to experts, there is a thin line between expressing success and expressing compensation. “Excessive use of luxury features can imply compensation,” said one expert in behavioral design.
That is, if everything is bling, nothing stands out. Trump disagrees, naturally. “You never managed to equate gold with gold paint,” he once said. “That’s why it’s gold.” At least he’s being consistent in his gospel of gold.
Internet Reactions: Roasts, Memes, and Defenses
When photos of the room leaked, the internet was abuzz. One meme called it “King Midas’s den of insecurity.” Others called it the lair of a Bond villain or the lobby of an Atlantic City casino.
But not everybody was laughing. Conservative loyalists saw the decor as tough, unapologetic, and unique. “It’s bold and unapologetic—just like the man,” wrote one on Twitter.
Design pundits chimed in as well, with a dash of laughter and horror. The one response that crossed party lines? Shock at the rumored Diet Coke button. It’s not elegant, perhaps, but this much is certain: it generated buzz, and quickly.
Critics vs. Loyalists—The Aesthetic War
To critics, Trump’s Oval Office is tacky, cluttered, and unseemly. “He decorates like a billionaire who believes Versailles is a furniture store,” one D.C. designer dared. But Trump loyalists have other opinions.
They say the gold symbolizes strength and triumph—a workspace for a man who shattered the political establishment. This argument reveals more than taste in aesthetics.
It shows how style politicizes. Is the room ego or legacy? Confidence or approval-seeking? Trump’s presidency, if not all of it, reduces to whoever you speak to—and how much more you value spectacle over comfort.
What’s Really in There?
The room also features busts of Churchill, portraits of founding fathers, and, naturally, that notorious Diet Coke button.
The tightly grouped gallery wall contains smaller presidents, each in heavy gold frames. Heavy, dramatic furniture abounds. The soothing color schemes of past administrations are gone. Instead: luxury turned up to eleven.
The fireplace mantel is graced with gilded vases. No greenery, no minimalism, and no contemporary art, by any means. Everything seems selected to impress or intimidate. Whether that was intentional or merely an aftereffect remains to be seen.
Last Judgment — Taste Is Subjective, But Gold Is Eternal
The Trump Oval Office won’t be remembered for understated refinement. But maybe that was the idea. To many, it is an ego monument, gold-plated and full of symbolism. To some, it’s simply a brazen statement by a brazen man.
Either way, it’s altered our perspective on presidential real estate. Can interior design be political? Can the design of buildings reveal anything about character? Trump’s associates say so—boastfully.
It’s not necessarily the highest on the list of things he’s done that have stirred controversy, but it ought to be. And like everything else gold, it won’t go quietly away. One thing’s clear: we’ll be debating this room for years.
Discover more DIY hacks and style inspo- Follow us to keep the glow-up coming to your feed!
Love content like this? Tap Follow at the top of the page to stay in the loop with the latest beauty trends, DIY tips, and style inspo. Don’t forget to share your thoughts in the comments — we love hearing from you!