Walmart, the world’s biggest retailer, is facing a storm like no other: a boycott rolling across the country and beyond.
The People’s Union USA has coordinated the protest, which is more than just a fleeting social media phenomenon; it’s a week-long organized display of opposition to spiraling prices, corporate greed, and the reversal of the brand’s diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies.
As customers, activists, and even legislators weigh in, the backlash is echoing from neighborhoods to boardrooms to cyberspace. And this is just the beginning: the impact of the boycott is sending shockwaves far beyond Walmart’s sliding automatic doors.
Why Now? The Roots of the Walmart Boycott
Beneath the boycott is a toxic mix of economic insecurity and cultural resentment. Walmart is being accused of “crushing small businesses,” underpaying its employees, and increasing prices under the guise of increased tariffs.
Further, the reversal of DEI initiatives, both at the federal level and within Walmart, has only added fuel to the fire, with people claiming that corporate America is prioritizing profit over social progress.
In response, the People’s Union USA, led by John Schwarz, is organizing a strategic fight against this “economic corruption,” vowing to hold corporations accountable.
How Consumers Are Feeling the Shift
For ordinary Americans, the boycott isn’t just another social media trend; it represents real, frustration. Reddit and TikTok users debate whether the boycotts can damage such a retail behemoth, or if they’re simply symbolic gestures.
Further, customers speak of empty shelves and late restocking, while others question whether the movement can outlast the convenience that Walmart represents for millions of citizens.
As Walmart’s store traffic decreases 2.4% year upon year, the company is seeing a shift in consumer sentiment. The tension is palpable: will this consumer revolt last, or fizzle out as economic pressure takes hold?
Behind Closed Doors: Corporate and Industry Reactions
In Walmart’s corporate offices, alarm bells are ringing. Walmart CEO Doug McMillon has addressed the difficulty publicly, stating that tariffs affect margins, making it impossible to shield customers from higher prices.
Walmart’s rivals, such as Target and McDonald’s, are bracing for their own boycotts, as The People’s Union USA expands its crusade. These boycotts – combined with inflation and tariff-driven uncertainty – are forcing retailers to reconsider everything from supply chain strategy to public messaging.
For smaller brands and suppliers, however, the risks are even higher—these boycotts could lead to a loss of shelf space or going out of business entirely if sales plummet too far and too rapidly.
Inside the Boycott: How the People’s Union USA Mobilized a Movement
The newest Walmart boycott is a collective effort led by The People’s Union USA, a grassroots movement founded by John Schwarz. On social media platforms like Instagram and Reddit, they called on supporters for a week-long boycott of Walmart, along with connected brands.
It serves as a protest against corporate greed, tax avoidance, and the devastation of small businesses. Their campaign, termed “economic resistance”, has plans to target additional merchants by staging a July 4th “economic blackout.”
Previously, Walmart was boycotted in February 2025 in a one-day consumer blackout in response to rolling back their DEI programs, a trend influenced by political pressure.
Rolling Back on DEI Programs
Rolling back on DEI efforts at Walmart and other large retailers is a significant reversal of corporate change, as a result of political, legal, and certain customer pressures.
Walmart, once a leader in workplace diversity, has halted racial equity training, cut back on supplier diversity, and withdrew support for LGBTQ initiatives. Critics have expressed concern that this threatens employees’ morale, destroys trust, and reduces innovation, especially as more than half of Walmart employees are women or members of minority groups.
The broader trend promises uncertainty for workplace diversity and potentially reshapes the way brands interact with employees and customers.
Changing Habits: The Rise of Alternatives and New Shopper Behaviors
As the boycott gains momentum, customers are experimenting with alternatives—online platforms, local grocery stores, and even direct-to-consumer brands.
Some are starting to shop at minority-owned businesses or small businesses, hoping to reverse the “Walmart Effect” that has plagued local economies for decades. While influencers on TikTok share their “Walmart-free weeks,” and Reddit communities dissect the best alternatives to Walmart’s private labels.
However, choice is a luxury not everyone can afford—there are low-income or rural communities that rely on Walmart as their only large retailer, highlighting the complexity and limitations of consumer-driven resistance.
Understanding The “Walmart Effect”
The “Walmart Effect” is the wide-ranging economic and social change that accompanies Walmart’s entry into an area, reshaping the local commercial landscape, wages and shopping habits.
Walmart’s purchasing power and supply chain management allow it to undercut local competition, enticing consumers and often forcing small retailers to close or lower wages in order to stay in business. This results in more unemployment, lower economic output, and less innovation in communities.
But the trend isn’t entirely negative: Walmart provides more product options, sometimes restraining inflation and bringing desirable goods into underserved markets.
Reshaping The Fashion and Beauty Sectors
The Walmart boycott can change the fashion and beauty sectors, in which it maintains dominance through cheap clothing lines and store-brand cosmetics like Equate.
If sales plummet, Walmart could reduce orders from foreign suppliers in developing nations, potentially destabilizing factories reliant on large orders, which occurred to Bangladesh’s garment industry during past fast-fashion boycotts.
Conversely, the protest can see customers flocking towards local or ethical brands in line with trends in “conscious consumerism.” Therefore, smaller eco-friendly companies may be positively impacted as boycotters seek alternatives, while competitors like Target are pressured to roll out DEI efforts across their own product lines to avoid the same backlash.
The Domino Effect: Its Impact on Local Economies and Global Trade
The impact of the boycott doesn’t only affect Walmart’s profits. The boycotts serve as the opposite of the “Walmart effect”, where privately-owned and local businesses report a modest boost to sales as shoppers look elsewhere.
However, as Walmart sees falling sales and lost profits, some worry that the longer-term effect may result in staff cuts or scaled back operations.
Moreover, the protest is resonating abroad as Walmart’s extensive supply chain feels the effects: suppliers are being squeezed on prices, and foreign manufacturers brace for fluctuations in their orders. Further, some international customers and activist groups are expressing solidarity or launching complementary campaigns.
Real Voices: Stories from the Front Lines
As good as these protests are in holding large retailers to account, there are human stories behind the boycott’s effects. Walmart employees have ambivalent feelings—some sympathize with protests overall agenda, while others fear losing their livelihood if sales drop.
On Reddit, former employees recount the relentless pace and low pay, echoing customers’ grievances. Shoppers, meanwhile, struggle with supporting a cause and needing to meet their families’ needs.
“We’ve watched these companies rake in billions while families can barely afford groceries,” organizer John Schwarz posted on Instagram, capturing the movement’s emotional core.
Lawmakers and Advocates Enter the Fray
The boycott has caught the attention of politicians and advocacy groups. President Trump has publicly urged Walmart to “eat the tariffs” and hold prices steady, while others are calling for the company to restore DEI initiatives and address wage disputes.
Some lawmakers are calling for greater regulation of corporate tax policies and price disclosure, though progress is gradual and frequently stalled in partisan gridlock.
Meanwhile, advocacy groups are seizing the opportunity to call for broader reforms in an attempt to channel consumer outrage into long-term policy change.
What’s Next? Navigating an Uncertain Retail Future
Going forward, the outcome of this boycott can alter how corporations respond to consumer activism. Analysts say short-term sales dips are possible, but Walmart’s quasi-monopoly in many markets offers a buffer against long-term damage—unless these protects continue and spread to other essential retailers.
For shoppers, the lesson is simple: together their voices can spark national debate, but concrete change may require more than avoid your local Walmart for a week. However, it must be said that retailers are paying attention, and might be ready to modify prices, public relations, and even product origins to fall in line with shifting customer habits and expectations.
What This Boycott Means for All of Us
The Walmart boycott is more than a protest—it’s a test of how powerful collective action can be in a divided, uncertain age. Whether it calls for immediate concessions or not, it’s already shifted the conversation of what consumers expect from the corporations that impact their lives.
The effects are emanate: challenging the status quo, exposing the compromises between affordability and ethics, and reminding us that even the biggest retail giants can feel the sting of public anger.
As the dust settles, the real question is not so much what happens to Walmart, but how this will shape the future of shopping, community, and corporate responsibility.
Discover more DIY hacks and style inspo- Follow us to keep the glow-up coming to your feed!
Love content like this? Tap Follow at the top of the page to stay in the loop with the latest beauty trends, DIY tips, and style inspo. Don’t forget to share your thoughts in the comments — we love hearing from you!